Stuart is an experienced commercial advocate who appears regularly in the High Court, Court of Appeal and in arbitration matters. Stuart qualified as a solicitor with Clifford Chance LLP in 1999 and thereafter spent time as a management consultant with McKinsey & Company and a banker with HSBC Investment Bank. Stuart is valued for his combination of legal expertise and significant commercial experience.
Stuart’s practice is focused on general commercial disputes, sports-related litigation, commercial fraud, company law (particularly unfair prejudice), insurance and property damage. He is acknowledged in the legal directories as being “responsive, attentive to detail and generous with his time” (Legal 500, 2016).
Stuart has a well-established practice in substantial commercial litigation acting for a range of commercial organisations, financial institutions, sports clubs and national governing bodies. Stuart often acts unled in cases against Silks and frequently leads his own juniors.
Stuart has also appeared in a number of cases in the TCC and has particular expertise in cross-examining engineering experts in complex technical disputes in property damage and construction cases. Stuart also has extensive experience of applying for urgent interim remedies in fraud and restrictive covenant cases and has appeared in numerous search and freezing order applications.
Stuart writes and broadcasts in all of his areas of expertise, most recently talking to Joshua Rozenberg on BBC Radio 4’s Law in Action on the high profile FIFA crisis.
Stuart is a very experienced commercial advocate who has represented clients in numerous High Court matters in disputes covering a range of areas of law. Areas where Stuart has particular expertise include:
- Commercial agency.
- General agency, particularly with regard to finance transactions.
- Guarantees and indemnities.
- Breach of distribution agreements.
- Breach of covenant cases in business sale agreements.
- Matters involving complex expert evidence.
Stuart has also acted in the TCC in a number of construction and engineering disputes and recently appeared (leading Will Clerk of 2TG) in a three week TCC trial which was the first major commercial trial to hear concurrent expert evidence (“hot-tubbing”) (Brookhouse Engineering (Evesham) Ltd v. Willbros Construction (U.S.) LLC  (TCC London October 2013 Judge Waksman QC)
Stuarts current practice includes acting for clubs, national bodies and individual athletes in a range of contractual, regulatory and disciplinary matters.
Stuart previously advised on a number of high-value finance transactions for sports bodies. Stuart advised on various issues including the FIA rules and other contractual and insolvency issues in the US$1.4 billion bond issue (Formula 1 Finance BV) and thereafter has advised investors on the structure of proposed investments relating to promotion rights and television rights in other areas of Formula 1 and the World Rally Championship. Stuart has also advised drivers in other areas of motorsport in relation to sponsorship and other contracts.
Stuart has recently advised a number of Premiership football clubs and an Italian Serie A club in relation to funding (and refinancing) structures for stadia. Such advice included consideration of the relevant FA and Premiership rules and regulations as well as the contractual and company law issues.
Stuart’s other cases include:
- X v. Y (Present)
Stuart is currently advising a Premier League football club in relation to a dispute with an Italian Serie A club. The advice relates to contractual issues, the interaction of the transfer agreement with the player’s Premier League Contract and the relevant parts of the FIFA Status and Transfer of Players Regulations.
- West Ham United v. Viagogo (2014/2015):
Stuart acted for West Ham in a dispute with Viagogo relating to the sponsorship agreement between the parties and ticketing arrangements.
- West Ham United v. Morrisons (2014/2015):
Stuart acted for West Ham in a dispute with Morrisons in relation to the aborted purchase of the Boleyn Ground by Morrisons.
- AFC Bournemouth v. Swanage Town FC (2009):
Stuart acted for AFC Bournemouth in a dispute with a shareholder of the club. The dispute primarily related to breaches of the FA Rules on club ownership and Stuart advised on the FA Rules and related contractual issues.
- Charlton Athletic v. Llanera (2008):
Stuart acted for Charlton Athletic in a dispute with a former sponsor in relation to a promotion offered to season ticket holders.
- Rugby Union
- Heineken Cup Dispute (2014/2015):
Stuart represented the Fédération Française de Rugby (FFR) in relation to the dispute as to the future of the Heineken cup. Stuart advised in relation to the enforceability of the existing contract with Sky television, the extent to which French clubs could participate in any future contract with BT Sport and the relevant IRB (now World Rugby) Rules.
- Leicester Tigers v. Various (2007):
Stuart acted in an application for an urgent injunction to prevent certain trading concessions from continuing to trade at their Welford Road ground.
- X v. RFU (1994):
Stuart advised a grass roots player in relation to allegations of serious misconduct heard by an RFU Disciplinary Panel. Stuart advised the player in relation to the rules of the RFU, evidential matters and prospects for judicial review.
- Motor Sport
- Ross Gunn:
Stuart advised Ross Gunn in relation to his BRDC Formula 4 driving contract and agreements (2014) and subsequently in relation to his driving contract with Beechdean Aston Martin Racing in the British GT Championship (2015).
- Jockey Club Racecourses Limited v. Amlin (2015/Present)
Stuart acts for an insurer in a dispute relating to damage to a stadium at Epsom Racecourse.
- Stuart is a member of the panel of Honorary Legal Advisors to the Alpine Club
Stuart has acted in numerous commercial fraud matters and is able to advise at all stages from the initial investigation, the obtaining of disclosure and other interim relief (particularly freezing and search orders) through to the management of proceedings, trial (or settlement) and enforcement. Many of these cases have been multi-jurisdictional in nature and Stuart has advised in cases involving parties or assets in numerous jurisdictions including Switzerland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands, Gibraltar, USA, Iran and Iraq.
Stuart has also acted in a number of cases involving breaches of restrictive covenants by employees, where the employee has misused confidential information to assist a competitor or to go into competition with the employer.
Recent instructions include acting for a major London property company in relation to a fraud committed by a senior employee, acting for the victim of a fraud committed by a group of employees against a major Midlands housing association and a case involving the protracted investigation of the misuse and conversion of equipment belonging to a major UK gas supplier (which resulted in the court granting a committal order against the Defendants).
Stuart has also developed particular expertise in dealing with committal applications arising out of commercial fraud cases and has acted in a number of cases where applicants have succeeded in having respondents committed to prison. His recent cases include the leading case on sentencing of F.W Farnsworth Ltd & Anor v. Lacy & Ors  EWHC 3487 (Ch).
Stuart also regularly advises solicitors and other professionals in relation to money laundering and issues emanating from the Bribery Act 2010. Stuart speaks regularly at conferences and other events on issues relating to the investigation and prevention of commercial fraud.
Stuart is an experienced commercial litigator with extensive experience of property damage cases particularly in the TCC. He has acted in cases involving floods, fires, defective design, product liability and subsidence.
Stuart recently represented the Claimant in a three week trial which was the first major TCC trial to hear concurrent expert evidence (“hot-tubbing”) Brookhouse Engineering (Evesham) Ltd v. Willbros Construction (U.S.) LLC. Stuart brings a wealth of experience from his broader commercial practice and is particularly experienced in dealing with complex expert evidence.
Stuart’s current cases include a series of claims relating to fires caused by defective electrical equipment and a claim relating to damage to the roof of a major sports stadium.
Stuart’s employment practice is focused on commercial disputes between employers and employees with a strong emphasis on restrictive covenants, confidential information and breaches of fiduciary and directors’ duties.
Stuart acted for the employer in FW Farnsworth Ltd v Lacy and others  IRLR 2830 (Ch); an important decision in relation to the incorporation of employment contracts by implied consent (see Harvey Bulletin 412 November 2012). Stuart’s employment practice often overlaps with his sport practice where he has advised a number of Premier League football clubs in relation to contractual disputes with players.
Stuart is highly experienced in applying for urgent interim relief to enforce restrictive covenants and the unlawful use of confidential information. He has also appeared in a number of committal applications where employees have been sentenced for breach of such injunctions including F.W Farnsworth Ltd & Anor v. Lacy & Ors  EWHC 3487 (Ch) a leading case on sentencing for committal.
Stuart has been involved in insurance law for in excess of 20 years. Stuart is regularly instructed in disputes arising from all policy types (e.g. professional indemnity, public liability and employers’ liability). He deals with construction and coverage disputes, subrogation issues, non-disclosure, brokers’ negligence, and fraudulent claims.
Stuart acts for insurers in the specialist field of sports law (where Stuart is a recognised leading practitioner), recently advising MS Amlin in relation to coverage issues following storm damage to a stand at the Epsom racecourse and advising in relation to the potential liabilities of a Premier League football club in relation to a player with serious health issues.