Who’s Who Legal Guide to the UK Bar 2021
We are delighted to have been ranked across 5 practice areas in the Who’s Who Legal Guide to the UK Bar 2021: Aviation & Travel, Construction, Insurance & Reinsurance, Mediation and Professional Negligence. New entries this year include:
Neil Moody QC
Andrew Miller QC
“Andrew Miller QC comes recommended by market commentators for “absolutely hitting the ground running” in mediations. Sources call him “a definite inclusion” for his work as mediator.”
Bob Moxon Browne QC
For further information on Who’s Who Legal, please visit: https://whoswholegal.com/firms/2-temple-gardens
Please follow the links above for further information on individual practices, or get in contact with our clerking team.
2TG Ranked in Chambers Global 2021
We are delighted to have been ranked by the leading legal directory, Chambers Global, in its 2021 publication.
We are recognised as one of the leading sets in ‘Dispute Resolution: Commercial’, with comments including “a particular flair for litigation involving contract disputes” and “home to a group of very experienced, commercial, persuasive and technically brilliant barristers”. Our clerking team is described as being “commercially engaged and proactive”.
Individual rankings were achieved by:
Further information can be viewed on the Chambers & Partners website here.
For further information on our Commercial Dispute Resolution team, please click here.
Many thanks to all of our clients and referees for their continued support and for the very kind comments we have received.
Isabel Barter appointed as joint General Editor of Bloomsbury’s “Journal of Professional Negligence”
This unique quarterly journal is the leading forum for commentary and analysis on all areas of professional negligence and professional indemnity, including liability, ethics and regulation. Isabel is very much looking forward to working with the team, in particular Colm McGrath, Lecturer in Tort Law at King’s College London.
Bloomsbury’s “Journal of Professional Negligence”
Charles Dougherty QC and Isabel Barter join major practitioner text
Charles Dougherty QC and Isabel Barter have joined Professional Negligence and Liability (ed M Simpson QC, Informa) as expert contributors. Professional Negligence and Liability is the most comprehensive practitioner work on professional negligence.
Lucinda Spearman successful in High Court appeal on the law applicable to interest under Rome II
On 6 November 2020, Mr Justice Griffiths handed down judgment in Troke and Allen v Amgen Seguros Generales Compania de Seguros y Reaseguros SAU (formerly RACC Seguros Compania de Seguros v Reaseguros SA)  EWHC 2976 (QB), the first High Court (or higher) judgment to determine conclusively the law applicable to the award of interest under Regulation (EC) 864/2007 (the Rome II Regulation). The court held that the lex fori governs the award of interest under Rome II.
The Claimants were in a road traffic accident in December 2014 in Spain. Liability was admitted, and it was agreed that the claim fell within the scope of Rome II. The only issue in dispute was the law applicable to the awards of interest claimed on special and general damages.
The Claimants argued that the applicable law was Spanish law as the lex causae, which, it was said, provided for a mandatory rate of interest to be awarded where an insurer failed to pay an interim payment within 3 months of the accident. They contended that the English court was accordingly compelled to award interest in accordance with Spanish law, giving them an interest award of over £13,500. The Defendant contended that awards of interest were a matter of procedure, and should accordingly be governed by the lex fori. In addition, the Defendant argued that the relevant Spanish law provision was itself procedural in nature.
The Defendant was successful at first instance, and the Claimants were awarded interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984, at a rate of 2% on general damages from the date of service of the claim form and 0.5% on special damages from the date on which they were incurred. This gave the Claimants a total interest award of just over £260.
The Claimants appealed to the High Court, arguing that interest was a matter of substance for the lex causae. The Defendant cross-appealed, arguing that the Claimants had not proved their right to interest under Spanish law as a matter of fact and that the interest claims should therefore fail.
The High Court dismissed the Claimants’ appeal, holding that an award of interest was characterised as a procedural matter under Article 1(3) of Rome II. The law of the forum (i.e. the law of England and Wales) therefore applied. The relevant Spanish law on interest was also procedural in nature: it concerned the provision of an interim payment, which had the quality of procedural matters, and imposed a penalty interest rate, which was a procedural sanction. There was no substantive right to interest at Spanish rates to be awarded under the lex causae. The judge was entitled to award interest at English rates. The cross-appeal did not fall to be considered.
In the future, therefore, interest in claims brought in England and Wales that fall within the scope of Rome II will be awarded in accordance with the English court’s wide discretionary powers under either section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 or section 35A of the Senior Courts Act 1981. Although corresponding interest provisions under the lex causae are a factor which the court may take into account in exercising its power to award interest, the English court will retain a total discretion per the domestic legislation.
This decision will have a considerable impact on the approach to interest in Rome II cases in the future. It is also a welcome development in this complex area of law, clarifying considerable ambiguities in earlier authorities on the point (cf. for example: Maher and anr v Groupama Grand Est  1 WLR 1564; Knight v Axa Assurances  EWHC 1900 (QB); XP v Compensa Towarzystwo SA and anr  EWHC 1728 (QB); As Latvijas Krajbanka v Antonov  EWHC 1679 (Comm)).
For a copy of the judgment, please click here.
Lucinda Spearman was instructed by Irwin Mitchell LLP and appeared for the successful Defendant.
Jessica van der Meer and Ruth Kennedy Appointed to Attorney General’s Public International Law C Panel
Members of Chambers are delighted to announce that Jessica van der Meer and Ruth Kennedy have been appointed to the Attorney General’s Public International Law C panel of junior counsel.
The Attorney General maintains three advisory panels of junior counsel to undertake civil and EU work for all government departments. There are three London panels, three regional panels and three public international law panels.
The new appointment is effective from Friday 30th October 2020 for a period of five years.
Information on Jessica’s and Ruth’s practices can be found via the links below.
The Times reports on the 2TG/The Times National Moot Final held on 11 September 2020
Congratulations to the winners Maya Chilaeva and Tey Khoo and runners-up Kim Pullinger and Matt Bignell of the 2TG/The Times National Moot Final which took place remotely on 11 September 2020 with Michael de Navarro QC, Howard Palmer QC and Sarah Vaughan Jones QC presiding.
Catherine Baksi reported in The Times Law Diary on 22nd October 2020
The article can be accessed here
2TG Chambers & Partners Rankings
We are delighted to announce our rankings for the Chambers and Partners UK Bar 2021 legal directory to include 14 new rankings in Commercial Dispute Resolution, Clinical Negligence, Employment, Insurance and Product Liability; an improved set ranking for Product Liability; we remain top ranked for Travel and Property Damage.
2TG now has a total of 70 members rankings across 12 practice areas.
Our clerking team is also recognised as a leader at the Bar for providing excellent client service.
Many thanks to all of our clients and referees for the very kind comments we have received.
Please click on the following to find details of our:-