Rehana Azib shortlisted for Outstanding Contribution to Diversity & Inclusion at The Chambers UK Bar Awards 2021

We are very pleased to announce that Rehana Azib has been shortlisted by Chambers and Partners for Outstanding Contribution to Diversity & Inclusion at the Chambers UK Bar Awards 2021.

To be shortlisted is as a result of extensive objective research by Chambers & Partners’ team of over 200 analysts and acknowledges individuals and teams at the pinnacle of the profession.

The Chambers UK Bar Awards 2021 will take place on Thursday 18 November at Old Billingsgate, London.

Back

Anna Hughes shortlisted for Clinical Negligence Junior of the Year at The Chambers UK Bar Awards 2021

We are delighted Anna Hughes has been shortlisted by Chambers & Partners for Clinical Negligence Junior of the Year at the Chambers UK Bar Awards 2021.

To be shortlisted is as a result of extensive objective research by Chambers & Partners’ team of over 200 analysts and acknowledges individuals and teams at the pinnacle of the profession.

The Chambers UK Bar Awards 2021 will take place on Thursday 18 November at Old Billingsgate, London.

Back

Two new tenants for 2TG

We are delighted to announce that Lauren Hitchman and Conor Ewing have accepted tenancy in Chambers, commencing on 1 October 2021, following completion of their pupillages.

We offer them our congratulations and wish them the very best for their futures at 2TG.

Back

Who’s Who Legal Guide to the UK Bar 2021

We are delighted to have been ranked across 5 practice areas in the Who’s Who Legal Guide to the UK Bar 2021: Aviation & Travel, Construction, Insurance & Reinsurance, Mediation and Professional Negligence. New entries this year include:

Construction:
Neil Moody QC

Mediation:
Andrew Miller QC

“Andrew Miller QC comes recommended by market commentators for “absolutely hitting the ground running” in mediations. Sources call him “a definite inclusion” for his work as mediator.”

Professional Negligence:
Bob Moxon Browne QC

For further information on Who’s Who Legal, please visit: https://whoswholegal.com/firms/2-temple-gardens

Please follow the links above for further information on individual practices, or get in contact with our clerking team.

Back

2TG Ranked in Chambers Global 2021

We are delighted to have been ranked by the leading legal directory, Chambers Global, in its 2021 publication.

We are recognised as one of the leading sets in ‘Dispute Resolution: Commercial’, with comments including “a particular flair for litigation involving contract disputes” and “home to a group of very experienced, commercial, persuasive and technically brilliant barristers”. Our clerking team is described as being “commercially engaged and proactive”.

Individual rankings were achieved by:

Further information can be viewed on the Chambers & Partners website here.
For further information on our Commercial Dispute Resolution team, please click here.

Many thanks to all of our clients and referees for their continued support and for the very kind comments we have received.

Back

Isabel Barter appointed as joint General Editor of Bloomsbury’s “Journal of Professional Negligence”

This unique quarterly journal is the leading forum for commentary and analysis on all areas of professional negligence and professional indemnity, including liability, ethics and regulation. Isabel is very much looking forward to working with the team, in particular Colm McGrath, Lecturer in Tort Law at King’s College London.

Bloomsbury’s “Journal of Professional Negligence”

Back

Charles Dougherty QC and Isabel Barter join major practitioner text

Charles Dougherty QC and Isabel Barter have joined Professional Negligence and Liability (ed M Simpson QC, Informa) as expert contributors. Professional Negligence and Liability is the most comprehensive practitioner work on professional negligence.

Back

Lucinda Spearman successful in High Court appeal on the law applicable to interest under Rome II

On 6 November 2020, Mr Justice Griffiths handed down judgment in Troke and Allen v Amgen Seguros Generales Compania de Seguros y Reaseguros SAU (formerly RACC Seguros Compania de Seguros v Reaseguros SA) [2020] EWHC 2976 (QB), the first High Court (or higher) judgment to determine conclusively the law applicable to the award of interest under Regulation (EC) 864/2007 (the Rome II Regulation). The court held that the lex fori governs the award of interest under Rome II.

The Claimants were in a road traffic accident in December 2014 in Spain. Liability was admitted, and it was agreed that the claim fell within the scope of Rome II. The only issue in dispute was the law applicable to the awards of interest claimed on special and general damages.

The Claimants argued that the applicable law was Spanish law as the lex causae, which, it was said, provided for a mandatory rate of interest to be awarded where an insurer failed to pay an interim payment within 3 months of the accident. They contended that the English court was accordingly compelled to award interest in accordance with Spanish law, giving them an interest award of over £13,500. The Defendant contended that awards of interest were a matter of procedure, and should accordingly be governed by the lex fori. In addition, the Defendant argued that the relevant Spanish law provision was itself procedural in nature.

The Defendant was successful at first instance, and the Claimants were awarded interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984, at a rate of 2% on general damages from the date of service of the claim form and 0.5% on special damages from the date on which they were incurred. This gave the Claimants a total interest award of just over £260.

The Claimants appealed to the High Court, arguing that interest was a matter of substance for the lex causae. The Defendant cross-appealed, arguing that the Claimants had not proved their right to interest under Spanish law as a matter of fact and that the interest claims should therefore fail.

The High Court dismissed the Claimants’ appeal, holding that an award of interest was characterised as a procedural matter under Article 1(3) of Rome II. The law of the forum (i.e. the law of England and Wales) therefore applied. The relevant Spanish law on interest was also procedural in nature: it concerned the provision of an interim payment, which had the quality of procedural matters, and imposed a penalty interest rate, which was a procedural sanction.  There was no substantive right to interest at Spanish rates to be awarded under the lex causae. The judge was entitled to award interest at English rates. The cross-appeal did not fall to be considered.

In the future, therefore, interest in claims brought in England and Wales that fall within the scope of Rome II will be awarded in accordance with the English court’s wide discretionary powers under either section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 or section 35A of the Senior Courts Act 1981. Although corresponding interest provisions under the lex causae are a factor which the court may take into account in exercising its power to award interest, the English court will retain a total discretion per the domestic legislation.

This decision will have a considerable impact on the approach to interest in Rome II cases in the future. It is also a welcome development in this complex area of law, clarifying considerable ambiguities in earlier authorities on the point (cf. for example: Maher and anr v Groupama Grand Est [2010] 1 WLR 1564; Knight v Axa Assurances [2009] EWHC 1900 (QB); XP v Compensa Towarzystwo SA and anr [2016] EWHC 1728 (QB); As Latvijas Krajbanka v Antonov [2016] EWHC 1679 (Comm)).

For a copy of the judgment, please click here.

Lucinda Spearman was instructed by Irwin Mitchell LLP and appeared for the successful Defendant.

Back