At 2TG our people are hard-working, forward-thinking and approachable. We believe our supportive culture is one of our greatest strengths.
With the set comprising around 60 barristers, we know each other well and work effectively together. We often operate in large teams with clients. Our practice management team is modern and commercial, matching barrister experience thoughtfully to clients’ requirements.
At 2TG our barristers are expert in a broad range of complementary practice areas and we enjoy repeat instructions from a variety of loyal clients.
Practised advocates from the start, all our Silks and the vast majority of our Junior barristers are recognised as leaders in their chosen fields. Many of us are at the forefront of shaping the law in our specialist areas and we pride ourselves in having excellent industry knowledge.
At 2TG our barristers have excellent experience acting across a range of industry sectors and we are able to offer advice in an informed and commercial context.
Our combination of practice area excellence and industry expertise means we possess real insight into the commercial realities facing our clients operating in these areas. Secondment plays an important part of our commitment to developing our skills and understanding.
2TG is home to award-winning accredited mediators, arbitrators, adjudicators and experts with considerable experience of alternative dispute resolution.
Our barristers are also skilled as advocates in different alternative dispute resolution procedures and work strategically with clients to understand their commercial objectives, and then to resolve litigation as cost-effectively and expeditiously as possible.
Work with an international dimension forms a significant part of many barristers’ work at 2TG.
We appear in international courts and arbitral tribunals all over the world, frequently acting on complex multi-jurisdictional disputes. We are particularly well-known for managing cross border litigation on matters of jurisdiction and applicable law and appear regularly in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal.
At 2TG, in addition to our professional advice, we are recognised for our excellent contribution to education and development. We provide regular high-quality training.
Our reputation among the legal profession and other clients for our first-rate webinars and in-person conferences is very important to us. We also contribute frequently at industry events and as editors of leading texts and authors on topics of legal interest.
Described as “an exceptional lawyer throughout” and “thorough, knowledgeable and always approachable”, Tom’s practice involves most aspects of civil commercial work, and he has particular expertise in group litigation and cases where conflicts of laws issues arise.
Prior to joining Chambers, Tom graduated first in his year before being awarded a PhD after being examined by Lord Reed. Tom taught at the University of Cambridge for seven years and was a Director of Studies in Law and a Bye-Fellow in Law at Murray Edwards College, Cambridge.
For the legal year 2019-20, Tom was the Judicial Assistant to Lady Arden and Lord Leggatt at the Supreme Court and Privy Council, where he was exposed to a number of high-profile cases across a range of disciplines.
Tom practises across the full spectrum of commercial work from interim relief to trials. Recent examples are below.
During his time at the Supreme Court, Tom worked on, inter alia, Shagang Shipping Company Ltd (in liquidation) v HNA Group Company Ltd [2020] UKSC 34; Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd [2020] UKSC 48 (on which Tom co-authored a chambers’ case note, available here, and authored a piece in the Cambridge Law Journal, available here); and Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi AS v OOO Insurance Company Chubb [2020] UKSC 38 (on which Tom co-authored a case note, available here).
Acting as junior counsel (led by Charles Dougherty KC) in group litigation involving allegations of a multi-national commercial fraud (ongoing).
Acting as junior counsel in a claim worth c £600m+ involving questions of contractual interpretation, transferred loss, and agency (ongoing).
Acting as junior counsel in a successful ex parte application for a worldwide freezing order involving allegations of unlawful means conspiracy, deceit, and breach of contract.
Acting as sole counsel in successfully obtaining an emergency interim mandatory injunction in a commercial property dispute.
Acting as successful sole counsel in a High Court claim relating to an alleged Singaporean commercial fraud.
Acting as sole counsel in a High Court claim against a group of companies, all in administration, seeking declarations and/or remedies for breach of contract, deceit, and misrepresentation (claim settled).
Acting as sole counsel in a High Court claim involving significant battle of the forms issues (claim settled).
Acting as sole counsel in a breach of contract claim relating to a sunken vessel (claim settled).
Tom has been instructed in numerous preliminary and multi-day final hearings before the Employment Tribunal involving, for example, issues of gross misconduct, directors, constructive dismissal, notice and holiday pay, and the impact of Covid-19 on working patterns. Tom has also worked on cases involving breach of confidentiality and restrictive covenants.
Recent and current work includes successfully defending a rail company (unled) in a discrimination trial (and obtaining a costs order of over £30,000), acting (led by Niazi Fetto KC) in the three-week trial of H v Ministry of Defence 2601422/2020, and being instructed in the appeal in Rubery v Ministry of Defence 3312963/2021.
Whilst at the Supreme Court, Tom worked on cases including Uber BV v Aslam [2021] UKSC 5; Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake [2021] UKSC 8; and Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly [2021] UKSC 10.
In June 2020, Tom gave a webinar on vicarious liability following new Supreme Court judgments (available here) and in July 2022 gave a webinar on Equality Act 2010 claims and limitation (available here).
Tom is often instructed in group claims, which frequently have an international dimension. Tom is happy to consider acting on a CFA.
Ongoing examples include:
The Grenfell Tower Litigation: Acting (led by David Turner KC, Clare Dixon KC, and Isabel Barter) for the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea and the Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation in litigation arising out of the Grenfell Tower fire.
The BMW NOx Diesel Emissions Group Litigation/NOx Emissions Group Litigation: Acting (led by Charles Dougherty KC) for BMW in a GLO that is currently managed with 12 other GLOs involving over a million Claimants. The President of the KBD has noted “the scale of the litigation is unprecedented”.
Various Claimants v (1) Crispin Odey and (2) Odey Asset Management LLP: Acting (led by Christopher Russell) in claims relating to alleged sexual assaults dating to the early 1990s. A hearing took place in March 2024 at which Master Sullivan, considering Abbott v MoD [2023] EWHC 1475 (KB), severed the initial Claim Form and required each Claimant to issue a Claim Form, with the claims to be case managed together in the future.
Tom frequently acts in insurance coverage (including fraud) disputes. Such claims often also involve property damage and/or product liability issues.
Acting (led by Howard Palmer KC) in an arbitration relating to policy coverage and cancellation clauses (arbitration concluded).
Advising (led by Howard Palmer KC) on an insurance policy designed to cover multi-million pound litigation funding investments.
Acting (led by Marie Louise Kinsler KC) in Colley v Shuker and ors [2020] EWHC 3433 (QB), which concerns the scope and effect of European Union insurance law Directives.
Acting as sole counsel for an insurer in a coverage dispute including allegations of fraud and raising novel questions regarding restitutionary principles (claim settled in insurer’s favour).
Tom practises across the full spectrum of personal injury litigation. Examples include working on matters involving injuries sustained abroad, employers’ liability, complex procedural applications, public authority liability, sexual assaults, and multi-defendant cases with indemnity disputes.
Tom is happy to consider work on a CFA basis and is particularly interested in cases involving alleged breaches of duty by the state.
Acting as junior counsel (led by David Turner KC, Clare Dixon KC, and Isabel Barter) in ongoing litigation arising out of the Grenfell Tower fire.
Acting as junior counsel (led by Christopher Russell) in (1) JFM and (2) MAM v (1) Crispin Odey and (2) Odey Asset Management LLP, an ongoing claim regarding alleged historic sexual assaults.
Acting as junior counsel (led by Niazi Fetto KC) in H v Ministry of Defence 2601422/2020, concerning personal injury resulting from sexual assault allegations.
Acting as junior counsel (led by Marie Louise Kinsler KC) in long running litigation involving a multi-million-pound personal injury claim with complicated questions of EU law.
Winks v HUK [2024] 1 WLUK 31: Acting for the successful Appellant in a dispute regarding whether claims relating to accidents abroad can be litigated in England and Wales.
Tom has a busy private international law practice, specialising in cases where conflict of laws issues arise. He is happy to consider instructions on a CFA basis. His recent work examples can be seen below.
Whilst at the Supreme Court Tom worked on cases such as and Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi AS v OOO Insurance Company Chubb [2020] UKSC 38 (on which Tom co-authored a case note) and Aspen Underwriting Ltd v Credit Europe Bank NV [2020] UKSC 11 (on which Tom co-authored a Practical Guide).
Winks v HUK [2024] 1 WLUK 31: Acting for the successful Appellant in a dispute regarding how the forum conveniens test should operate in accident abroad cases.
Acting (as sole counsel) in a contested registration of a foreign judgment involving allegations of fraud in Singapore worth over $1,500,000.
Acting as junior counsel (led by Charles Dougherty KC) in a disputed Hague Evidence Convention matter.
Acting (led by Will Clerk) in an ex parte worldwide freezing order matter with jurisdiction and applicable law issues.
Acting as junior counsel in a dispute relating to jurisdiction in a foreign parent company claim.
Advising and acting in a case involving a sunken vessel, breach of contract, and three jurisdictions.
Advising and acting in a contribution claim involving foreign applicable law and an arbitration agreement.
Tom is frequently instructed in products claims involving personal injury and property damage. Tom has a particular interest in cross-border product liability claims.
Acting as junior counsel (led by David Turner KC, Clare Dixon KC, and Isabel Barter) in litigation arising out of the Grenfell Tower fire.
Acting as junior counsel (led by Charles Dougherty KC) in group litigation arising out of allegations of ‘defeat devices’ affecting vehicle performance.
Instructed as sole counsel in litigation relating to an allegedly defective household electrical product that allegedly caused severe personal injury. This matter involved disputes as to the content of foreign law.
Assisting Charles Dougherty KC and Isabel Barter with Wilson v Beko plc [2019] EWHC 3362 (QB), the leading case on the interrelation between Parts 1 and 2 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987.
Tom’s professional negligence practice includes dealing with allegations against a wide range of professionals, including accountants, solicitors and surveyors.
Acting as junior counsel (led by David Turner KC, Clare Dixon KC, and Isabel Barter) in litigation arising out of the Grenfell Tower fire.
Acting for an accountant in disciplinary proceedings brought by their regulatory body concerning alleged breaches of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017.
Representing a surveyor at trial involving disputes over breach, causation, and the correct measure of loss.
Advising in a construction dispute that had allegedly led to substantial diminution in value to the Claimant’s property.
Tom has extensive experience in public law. His doctorate focused on administrative law and he has published with Hart, the Cambridge Law Journal, Judicial Review, and the UK Constitutional Law Blog. Tom’s work was recently cited in the Independent Review of Administrative Law report, chaired by Lord Faulks KC.
Tom supervised administrative law at the University of Cambridge for seven years and is a member of the Attorney General’s ‘Junior Junior’ Scheme. Tom’s recent work examples are below.
Whilst at the Supreme Court, Tom worked on cases including R (Miller) v The Prime Minister [2019] UKSC 41; R (Palestine Solidarity Campaign Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2020] UKSC 16; AM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] UKSC 17; and R (Maughan) v Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner for Oxfordshire [2020] UKSC 46.
At the Supreme Court Tom was invited to be part of a small team that produced materials for the Justices on European Union law post-Brexit.
Advising on the state’s positive obligations under the Human Rights Act 1998.
Advising in relation to a regulatory body’s disciplinary procedure’s compatibility with procedural fairness requirements.
Acting (led by Niazi Fetto KC) in a matter concerning the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Employment Tribunal’s jurisdiction.
Acting as junior counsel to Marie Louise Kinsler KC in a High Court matter that requested, inter alia, a reference to the CJEU.
Advising on the state’s positive obligations under the Human Rights Act 1998.
Advising in relation to a regulatory body’s disciplinary procedure’s compatibility with procedural fairness requirements.
Working on the Brook House Inquiry.
Working on the Covid-19 Inquiry.
Working on Napier Barracks litigation.
Tom has an exceptionally busy travel law practice, and specialises in jurisdiction and/or applicable law disputes. He also has particular expertise in Montreal Convention and Athens Convention cases. His recent work can be found below.
At the beginning of his third year of practice Tom was ranked as one of six ‘Rising Stars’ in the field by Legal 500 and he is happy to consider instructions on a CFA basis. His recent work can be found below.
Whilst at the Supreme Court Tom worked on cases such as and Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi AS v OOO Insurance Company Chubb [2020] UKSC 38 (on which Tom co-authored a case note) and Aspen Underwriting Ltd v Credit Europe Bank NV [2020] UKSC 11 (on which Tom co-authored a Practical Guide).
Advising (led by Meghann McTague) in a personal injury claim involving a yachting accident and the Athens Convention.
Instructed as sole counsel by the Claimants in a multi-day trial applying foreign law with a KC acting for the Defendant.
Advising and acting in a contribution claim involving foreign applicable law and an arbitration agreement.
Advising on the Hague Evidence Convention and the requirements for witnesses to give evidence from abroad.
Frequently acting in Part 11 jurisdiction challenges for both Claimants and Defendants.
Frequently advising on jurisdiction matters including burden and standard of proof and the scope of the PD6B Gateways.
Drafting applications (with supporting witness statements) applying to serve Claim Forms out of the jurisdiction.
Often acting in matters, including to trial, involving disputes as to the content of foreign law.
Acting in a range of holiday claims.
My contact details:
ICO Reg No: ZA503542
Address: 2 Temple Gardens, London, EC4Y 9AY
Email: clerks@2tg.co.uk
Phone: +44 (0)20 7822 1200
The type of personal information I collect
To enable me to provide you with legal advice and representation in courts, tribunals, arbitrations and mediations, I currently collect and process the following personal information:
Personal identifiers, contacts and characteristics (for example, name, date of birth and contact details), bank and financial details, your background and circumstance and education.
Other personal data relevant to, or included in instructions to provide legal services, including data specific to the instructions in question and data included in documents provided to me as part of instructions or otherwise.
Such information may include personal information relating to family members, associates, agents, employees, shareholders or beneficial owners. By providing such personal information to me, you automatically confirm that you are authorised to do so. It is not reasonably practicable for me to provide the information set out in this Privacy Notice to those individuals. Accordingly, where appropriate, you are responsible for providing this information to any such individuals.
Where necessary, I may also need to process Special Category data about you including
How I get the personal information and why I have it
Most of the personal information that I process is provided to me directly by you or via the professional you have instructed such as a solicitor or consultant or other professional adviser who instructs me on your behalf to provide legal services.
I use the information that you have given me in order to
I may share this information with
Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the lawful basis I rely on for processing this information is
How I store your personal information
Your information is securely stored in Chambers or at my home. I use reasonable technical and organisational security measures such as password protection and encryption of computer generated data and keeping paper data secure to prevent personal information from being accidentally lost or destroyed, or used or accessed in an unauthorised way.
In this connection, Chambers, as data processor, acting on my behalf, will only process your personal data on my instructions and is subject to a duty of confidentiality.
The data will be held in line with any regulatory obligations and generally be kept for 6 years but may be 12 years, or longer where, for example, the case includes information relating to a minor, from the date of completion of instructions. At this point any further retention will be reviewed and the data will be marked for deletion or marked for retention for a further period.
All data will be securely deleted or securely shredded after this time without reference to you. I will store some of your information which I need to carry out conflict checks for the rest of my career. However, this is likely to be limited only to your name and contact details and the name of the case. It will not include any information that is “sensitive information” for GDPR purposes.
Your data protection rights
Under data protection law, you have rights including:
Transfer of your information outside the European Economic Area (EEA)
This privacy notice is of general application and as such it is not possible to state whether it will be necessary to transfer your information out of the EEA. If I do transfer your personal data I will use safeguards to ensure the data is fully protected as required by the UK Data Protection Regulations.
Changes to my Privacy Policy
From time to time, I may need to make chances to my privacy policy. If so, the changes will appear on my entry on the 2TG website.
Marketing
As above, I may share your personal data with Chambers who may in turn use that data to notify you by email, or post about an invitation to seminars and similar events. You may opt out of receiving any such marketing communications at any time by using the “unsubscribe” link in any emails. In relation to how Chambers uses such data, please see Chambers’ privacy policy. Other than sharing personal data with Chambers as described above, I will not share your information with any other third party for marketing purposes.
How to complain
If you have any concerns about my use of your personal information, you can make a complaint to me or to my Senior Clerk, Lee Tyler at 2 Temple Gardens, London, EC4Y 9AY or clerks@2tg.co.uk. You can also complain to the ICO if you are unhappy with how we have used your data.
The ICO’s address:
Information Commissioner’s Office
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
Cheshire
SK9 5AF
Helpline number: 0303 123 1113
ICO website: https://www.ico.org.uk
© Briefed Ltd 2021. All Rights Reserved.
“His drafting skills are second to none and his judgment is always spot on.”
Legal 500 2025
“Tom is thorough, knowledgeable and always approachable”
Legal 500 2024
“Tom is very strong on each of the following: advocacy, commercial vision, level of expertise and sophistication of work and client service. Tom is an exceptional lawyer throughout.”
Legal 500 2023